2024 CALIFORNIA BILLS - PART 1
We are mid-way through 2024 bill season, here is where we stand to date ....
PART 1 (BILLS TO SUPPORT)
I am moving a bit outside of the gender sphere. It may be the result of hours sitting in hearings for a measly 2-minutes of testimony that has pushed me deeper into the incomprehensible territory of the California legislature that proposes bill after bill that remove any remaining goodness and freedom in this state. Or it may be that all of the blinders have been removed from my eyes, clouded by my three decades of automatic belief that the Democrats were the party of truth and science.
The lawmakers did cool their jets a bit with transgender legislation. Ok, that is not quite true – they are just returning to their incrementalism strategy and being a bit more stealth. Perhaps they heard us, have been doing some reading, or they have run out of bill ideas. Personally, I believe that they are biding their time, waiting to spring the granddaddy of all bills that will force all parents to mark their children’s birth certificates as “unknown”, requiring them to place their children on puberty blockers until they reach twelve-years-old when their child can finally tell them what sex they are. Don’t believe me – may I remind you that per our legislature, men can get pregnant and women are merely a belief, parents are naturally abusive, and children can be born wrong with a mismatch of brains versus bodies.
When the legislators voted to pass a bill that we normies opposed (SB932 in 2022), with one of the co-sponsors of the bill – Breaking the Binary - dressed in a yellow chiffon full length dress with torpedo Ta-tas bursting from his chest, while sporting a full beard that framed his ruby red lips, with more eye make-up on than beauty counter saleswoman, I knew that our state had lost its mind. Not much has changed in the last couple years, except that the witnesses have gotten even stranger - Scott Wiener had a black trans-identified male prostitute as his witness in a bill who looked like he just left his corner - more about that in the next installments.
Here are a couple of photographs of Addison Rose who is likely getting paid gobs of taxpayer’s money to “teach” doctors that he is perfectly normal, and is neither male nor female, because of how he envisions himself. Yes, it’s grifters like him who are adding to the state’s debt.
THESE BILLS ARE IN ORDER OF IMPORTANCE. We must celebrate that there are a few bi-partisan bills that actually protect children, but many are just to score political points from the gender public who do not actually read the bills.
1. SUPPORT AB3080 (Alanis (R), Hoover (R), Rubio (D) and Neillo (R) - bi-partisan bill) – Children and Porn. This bill requires distributors of porn to take reasonable steps to verify that the age of the consumer, including for on-line viewing, is 18 or older. This bill has a lot of support but could fall apart now that the ACLU is opposing it. When the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, Equity California or the California Teachers Association say “jump”, the monkeys ask “how high?” Children and youth viewing pornography is correlated with gender confusion, violence towards sexual partners and unhealthy perceptions of sex. Assembly member Alanis has done a tremendous job with this bill. Democrat Blanco Rubio appears to much more of a trad-Dem. I am watching him closely because she has heart. Send her a thank you email through her chief of staff - minnie.santillan@asm.ca.gov. We need to praise those who do the right thing.
Status as of May 19, 2024
· Passed Assembly Floor and moving to Senate committees
2. SUPPORT SB1414 (Grove (R) – this bill was taken over by the Democrats) – Sex Trafficking and Minors. This bill was designed to punish the “Johns” soliciting sex from all minors with significant punishments, but the Democrats took over the bill and eviscerated it. Per the Democrats, kids aged 16-18 are undeserving of protection, and the “Johns” are required to have been caught twice in order for their crime to be a felony. Question: do the kids who get raped once feel less victimized if it was the first time their abuser got caught? The 16-year-old victim’s “john” is not a felon, because after all selling sex has been done throughout history, per Senator Nancy Skinner. Slavery was a norm too as was human sacrifice. I wonder if depraved Nancy wants to decriminalize those historical “norms” too. For more about this bill, read Chris Bray’s article. He covered this abomination more succinctly than I could ever hope to do. Oh, and keep watching for this 16-18 age range. This administration is gunning for 16 to be seen as adults when it comes to sex. When they get pregnant, they just been to hop over to Mary L. Stephens Library in Davis, that sells Plan B in its vending machine. (I cannot make this shit up.)
Status as of May 19, 2024
· Senate Floor Vote Pending
· If the bill passes, it moves to Assembly committees
3. SUPPORT SB1283 (Stern (D)) – Students and Social Media – This bill requires schools to adopt a policy that limits or prohibits the use of social media and smart phones while at school, with exceptions for emergencies and use for school curriculum or projects.
Status as of May 19, 2024
· Senate Floor Vote Pending
· If the bill passes, it moves to Assembly committees
4. SUPPORT SB963 (Ashby (D)) – Victims of Sex Trafficking.
This bill provides that emergency facilities are to give resources to victims of sex trafficking.
Status as of May 19, 2024
· Passed Senate and moving to Assembly Committees
5. SUPPORT SB933 (Wahab and Ochoa-Bogh - bi-partisan bill) – Children and Porn. This bill adds computer-generated images of minors to the crime of possessing images of children engaging in sexual conduct. This bill that will likely pass without much fanfare, but it does little to protect actual children. The Democrats will use this nothing-burger of a bill to say, “see, we care about children,” all while killing Senator Kelly Seyarto’s SB1219 during its first hearing. SB1219 would have done more than any other bill to protect children from being trafficked because it repealed Sen. Scott Wiener’s repeal of the loitering law. The loitering law is the best tool for police to bring in under-age looking prostitutes to help them. That law would have also impounded the cars of the “johns” looking to break the law. Seyarto couldn’t even get the committee to move the bill for a vote. The spineless Democrats avoided having a record of voting against a bill to protect our most vulnerable - street kids. Pathetic.
I must admit I am perplexed that one of Seyarto’s co-authors did not present the bill for him so he could move the bill from the dais, but I suspect the outcome would have been the same, after all the grand puppeteer, Scott Wiener, was there to oppose it because, all things hedonic must be maintained, even at the expense of children, or was that by design?
Status as of May 19, 2024
· Passed Senate
· Awaiting assignment to Assembly Committees
6. SUPPORT AB1831 (Bi-partisan bill) – Children and Porn – This bill adds AI generated images of children to the list of materials that are crimes for possession, circulation and distribution. This bill also does little to protect actual children. This bill does nothing more than give a fake “good guy” mark in the Democrats’ column. Watch Newsom preen over this bill while, voting to house foster care children with adults of the opposite sex. (See Part II.)
Status as of May 19, 2024
· Passed Assembly Floor
· Moving to Senate committees
7. SUPPORT SB996 (Wilk (R), with too many to name other Republicans co-authoring.) Schools and Sex Education Curriculum. This bill requires schools to post its sex-ed curriculum on its website or through the parent portal. Equity California opposed the bill because wants parents to be kept in the dark about what their children are learning at school. Strangely, or perhaps not, Senator Wilk, a lame duck, had no witness to support his bill, and was ill-prepared on the question that has routinely been raised as the excuse for not posting the materials – copyright. I was unimpressed by his lackluster effort - going through the motions so he can shrug his shoulders and say he tried - or perhaps he has been beaten down too long to care. I think it's the latter, but come on, at least, he could have reached out to parent groups who would have supplied knowledgeable witnesses.
Status as of May 19, 2024 –
· Appropriations Suspense File. UPDATE - It was killed. This is another little trick by the Democrats, let get through the first committee and kill it in appropriations. Claim that uploading curriculum is going to cost the state 100s of thousands of dollars. Most school could do it 5 minutes flat.
8. SUPPORT AB1873 (Sanchez (R)
This bill would additionally make a person guilty of a misdemeanor or a felony if the person knowingly develops, duplicates, prints, or exchanges any representation of information, data, or image, generated using artificial intelligence, that depicts a person under the age of 18 years engaged in an act of sexual conduct, as specified.
Status of May 19, 2024
· Melded in AB1831 the Berman bill - see above. Look at that another bi-partisan bill.
California voters have the ability to influence the bills. The following need immediate attention.
For bills SB1414 and SB1283, call your Senator and request that they vote YES on those bills. You can discuss or simply state, your name, that you are constituent and that you support the bill. Find your Senator here.